Adobe's Tom Hogarty on corrections in DNG

by Richard Butler on June 29, 2009 in News | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

Following on from our look at the new correction parameters added into the latest DNG specifications, senior product manager and writer of Adobe’s Lightroom blog, Tom Hogarty, spoke to us about how these correction parameters were chosen and developed:

Continue reading "Adobe's Tom Hogarty on corrections in DNG" »

Unless otherwise specified: DNG gains lens corrections

by Richard Butler on June 24, 2009 in News | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Adobe’s DNG specifications may seem like a rather esoteric and arcane document to go digging around in, if you’ve only got experience of developing pictures, rather than software. However, the latest changes, that allow for ‘corrections and enhancements’ might be of interest, because they give something of an insight into the kinds of processing and corrections that camera manufacturers are applying to their RAW data.

In order to provide a non-proprietary way of storing RAW data, DNG files have to include all the processing instructions necessary to produce a final image the way the camera manufacturer wanted. Consequently, to act as a universal format, the DNG specification has to have the capability to define all the different types of processing that those manufacturers might want to apply to their RAW data to accurately produce a finished image.

So the addition of correction and enhancement parameters (known as ‘opcodes’) into the DNG v1.3 specification gives us some clues about the behind-the-scenes work manufacturers are doing to produce the best possible images from the RAW data their cameras are capturing.

Continue reading "Unless otherwise specified: DNG gains lens corrections" »

From trickles to tides: leaks and rumors

by Simon Joinson on June 18, 2009 | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
The deluge of leaked information ahead of this week's official announcement of the Olympus E-P1 led to several forums posters asking us why we were ignoring this important information and how it was that small, low traffic websites and gadget blogs had the scoop on a site like Dpreview. Of course the the truth is that they didn't; we had already used the camera and were in the middle of producing an in-depth preview article for publication at the moment the official embargo was lifted.

So why don't we report on rumors or even comment on leaks? It's certainly not just because we've signed an NDA (legally binding non-disclosure agreement); so has everyone else who is given access to the information ahead of the embargo, and you don't see them hauled through the courts for breaking them. And besides, the NDAs are usually pretty much null and void once the information is in the public domain.

Continue reading "From trickles to tides: leaks and rumors" »

Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com Ltd.